CAJ panel proposes ethics guidelines for digital age
Wondering if it’s OK to take a previously “published” photo off Facebook to run with your story? Unsure whether you should “friend” your sources? Or thinking about how much verification you need when finding sources online?
In an attempt to answer these and other ethical questions presented by the Digital Age, the Canadian Association of Journalists’ ethics advisory committee has been working to revise the organization’s familiar Statement of Principles and Ethical Guidelines.
It’s the first revision for the ethics code since it was written in 2002, and as we all know, the industry has gone through monumental changes in that time.
In one sign of how outdated the
existing guidelines are, the document has not a single mention of the online
world.
New digital media section
That’s one of several reasons why the committee appointed a
three-person panel to draft revisions to the code. The panel has proposed online-oriented
enhancements to several parts of the document, plus a new “Digital Media”
section in which we note initially that, “Ethical
practice does not change with the medium,” and that ethical principles such as
accuracy, fairness, independence and keeping promises to sources apply “no
matter where our stories are published or broadcast.”
The proposed new section also works in many elements not previously addressed in the guidelines, including recent findings by the full ethics committee regarding practices around personal activity online and re-tweeting, as well as online corrections (on which a committee report is forthcoming).
But the overhaul doesn’t stop with digital content; in
reviewing the existing guidelines, we found that the original code also
contained many references that were overly legalistic or corporate in nature –
and others that just didn’t seem to reflect current everyday practice of our
craft.
So the panel – led by myself and also including investigative journalist and CAJ past-president Julian Sher, and Connie Monk, head of broadcast journalism at the British Columbia Institute of Technology – has been working for months to make the code more complete, practical and user-friendly. In addition to numerous content changes, we’ve proposed a new format that we hope will make it easier for journalists to find the points that interest them.
Now, after intensive review by
the full CAJ Ethics
Committee, our draft is ready for the feedback that counts: yours.
We ask you to review our proposed Principles for Ethical Journalism – reformatted into a condensed “splash page” that boils down the essential points for quick and easy reference. More in-depth details are available in the long-form Ethics Guidelines that address finer points such as undercover reporting, using quotes in context, handling requests to unpublish, reporting on polls and medical studies, engaging in political activities, and contacting crime victims.
CAJ conference session
Both versions of the guidelines will be presented at a special session of the CAJ’s annual conference in Ottawa (May 13-15). In addition to seeking your general suggestions, ethics committee chair Ivor Shapiro (Ryerson University) will join me in attempting to gain consensus on a few points that were contentious even among our own members.
These contentious points in the
panel’s draft include whether showing finished reports to sources prior to
publication is an iron-rule no-no, whether different standards for freebies
should be applied to travel writing, and whether there might be cases where it
is OK to pay sources for information. Plus: must online content always be
edited “as carefully as” content for legacy media?
Please join us for this important discussion, which will take place Saturday morning, May 14, at 09:00 at the Sheraton Ottawa Hotel.
And if you can’t join us in person, please read over the proposed new documents anyway and send any and all feedback to me (with “CAJ Ethics” in the subject field) at ssnowcapparelli@mtroyal.ca.
Shauna Snow-Capparelli, a former Los Angeles Times staff writer and entertainment columnist, is associate professor of journalism at Mount Royal University, where she’s also supervising editor of the Calgary Journal and the author of the school’s "Journalism Code of Ethics and Professional Practices.”
Comment Policy
J-Source invites comments on any content items or on any other topics relevant to journalism. Those posting comments are expected to adhere to standards of accuracy and fairness that would be recognized by those who practise, teach or study journalism.
- Comments are restricted to registered users. You must register with your full first and last name in order to be eligible to comment.
- Please communicate as effectively and intelligently as you would in a professional or academic forum, focusing on the issues at hand rather than the characters or characteristics of those involved.
- This forum is intended for discussion of the craft of journalism, not of the issues of the day that journalists cover; please do not post story tips or press releases.
- We moderate the forum for adherence to these standards of discourse, and reserve the right to decline any comment or restrict any user from commenting without giving reasons. Every effort is made to approve valid comments within 24 hours of submission.



Opinion: Media's latest stories on Toronto's Mayor Ford a challenge for a court fight
Thank you, Thomas, I'll check it out.
Everything journalists need to know about "Crackgate"
- this whole thing says a LOT more about the state of the press in Canada (I won...
Opinion: The National Newspaper Awards don't reflect journalism in the digital era
The NNAs have been irrelevant for some time now. Basically, the major newspaper chains buy...