Canadians believe journalists pay for tips, hack phones

ShareThis

About 40 per cent of Canadians believe phone hacking and paying for story tips are tactics used by media here, according to a recently-released Ipsos Reid poll conducted on behalf of the Canadian Journalism Foundation.

Of those 40 per cent, seven in 10 believe both activities are taking place, one-quarter think only payments are taking place, and only 4 per cent think phone hacking is happening. A little more than half believe phone hacking/payments happen just some of the time. We're not sure if that warrants a breath or relief or not: 38 per cent think these things happen all the time on the journo job.

What's more, more than half of Canadians also think an individual should receive accreditation from some sort of industry-wide standards body to be a journalist in Canada. Only 44 per cent believe it's enough that the employer has already evaluated the journalist's skills set and talent, and can fire the journalist if performance falls into the bad job zone.

"I know that media in Canada have not gone the way of theNews of the World. Yet the Murdoch excesses have unfairly tainted the whole business," says CJF chair Robert Lewis in a release. "Journalists need to redouble their commitment to accountability and transparency."

The CJF commissioned the poll in conjunction with Thursday's forum, "Fallout from phone hacking: Do we need regulation?", inspired by the News of the World scandal, and subsequent shutdown of the paper, earlier this year.

Panellists for the forum include: John Honderich, chair of Torstar and former publisher and editor of the Toronto Star; Brian Myles, journalist with Le Devoir and president of the Fédération professionnelle des journalistes du Québec; John Owen, journalism professor at City University in London UK and former head of CBC Television News; and Jamie Cameron, professor at York University’s Osgoode Law School.

 

Comments

If journalists are to "redouble their commitment to accountability and transparency", as Robert Lewis puts it, and do it in a manner that actually looks like accountability and transparency to the public, they're going to have to go beyond the convenient half-measures of the past and actually consider something like accreditation.

Could it be that Canadians don't really know what journalists do, which is why, despite their increasing prevalence, I don't trust survey results. Do we operate based on people's wrong perceptions or fact? People are willing to comment on anything and many times they're ill-informed, so should we care?

And, does anyone truly know how prevalent phone hacking and paying for story tip is in Canada or do we say 'Tsk tsk, it doesn't happen here,' and continue to keep our provinical heads in the sand? On what does Mr. Lewis base his comments?

 

Comment Policy

J-Source invites comments on any content items or on any other topics relevant to journalism. Those posting comments are expected to adhere to standards of accuracy and fairness that would be recognized by those who practise, teach or study journalism.

  • Comments are restricted to registered users. You must register with your full first and last name in order to be eligible to comment.
  • Please communicate as effectively and intelligently as you would in a professional or academic forum, focusing on the issues at hand rather than the characters or characteristics of those involved.
  • This forum is intended for discussion of the craft of journalism, not of the issues of the day that journalists cover; please do not post story tips or press releases.
  • We moderate the forum for adherence to these standards of discourse, and reserve the right to decline any comment or restrict any user from commenting without giving reasons. Every effort is made to approve valid comments within 24 hours of submission.
source