J-Source

Documents in the raw undermine propaganda

While the leaking of Afghan war documents has been criticized in some Canadian columns, on the pages of J-Source WikiLeaks is described as citizen journalism we need and a new form of asymmetrical journalism. Founder Julian Assange, a self-described ‘person of interest’ to U.S. authorities, explains his decision to provide advance viewings to select outlets.…

While the leaking of Afghan war documents has been
criticized in some Canadian columns, on the pages of J-Source WikiLeaks is
described as citizen
journalism we need
and a new form of
asymmetrical journalism
. Founder Julian Assange, a self-described ‘person of
interest’
to U.S. authorities, explains his decision to provide advance
viewings
to select outlets. The mainstream media partnerships weren’t
completely comfortable: Assange later criticized the New
York Times
for its handling of the data, including checking with the White
House before publishing and not providing a direct link to the documents. An alternative strategy could have been dribbles instead of dumps. Here
are links to compare the special reportage sites: New York Times,
Der
Spiegel
, the
Guardian
.

To Afghanistan observers, the documents undermined
government propaganda
, which – we learn from the docs – includes paying for
positive stories
. Unlike the NYT, J-Source has no problem providing a
direct link to the WikiLeaks war
documents site
, as well as to data-dumping links and instructions
for CAR journos. (And we didn’t check with Ottawa first.)

(Photo: WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, by Martina Harris/Julian Assange.)     

While the leaking of Afghan war documents has been
criticized in some Canadian columns, on the pages of J-Source WikiLeaks is
described as citizen
journalism we need
and a new form of
asymmetrical journalism
. Founder Julian Assange, a self-described ‘person of
interest’
to U.S. authorities, explains his decision to provide advance
viewings
to select outlets. The mainstream media partnerships weren’t
completely comfortable: Assange later criticized the New
York Times
for its handling of the data, including checking with the White
House before publishing and not providing a direct link to the documents. An alternative strategy could have been dribbles instead of dumps. Here
are links to compare the special reportage sites: New York Times,
Der
Spiegel
, the
Guardian
.

To Afghanistan observers, the documents undermined
government propaganda
, which – we learn from the docs – includes paying for
positive stories
. Unlike the NYT, J-Source has no problem providing a
direct link to the WikiLeaks war
documents site
, as well as to data-dumping links and instructions
for CAR journos. (And we didn’t check with Ottawa first.)

(Photo: WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, by Martina Harris/Julian Assange.)     

[node:ad]

Patricia W. Elliott is a magazine journalist and assistant professor at the School of Journalism, University of Regina. You can visit her at patriciaelliott.ca.