The Gawker-Toronto Star cat fight about the Rob Ford "exclusive"


Last night, Gawker posted a video for sale allegedly starring Toronto mayor Rob Ford smoking crack cocaine. The video became the subject of a frenzied discussion on Twitter, with many cautioning about libel laws. And then started the hilarious cat fight on Twitter about who got the "exclusive."

Gawker appears to have forced the Toronto Star into publishing the story on the video that they had been sitting on for almost two weeks. Reporters Kevin Donovan and Robyn Doolittle apparently saw the alleged video on May 3, but were doing due diligence, one can suppose.

About an hour and half later, the Star "took a cagey approach that linked to Gawker — along with the promise of “much more to come,” reported. And editor-in-chief Michael Cooke tweeted an "exclusive" to come. (Picture courtesy of

Here is the Toronto Star's front page with the "exclusive" label from the morning after: 

Needless to say, Gawker's managing editor Tom Scocca and many other casual readers were not impressed by the Star's claim to an exclusive. And then there were those who felt Gawker's rant was unnecessary. 

The "exclusive" gaffe made the Star's editor-in-chief a trending topic in Canada:

And here's how reporter Robyn Doolittle responded:

Nitpicking aside, it's clear that Gawker broke this story. As reports:" In the end, the New York outlet was able to gloat that it technically published a blockbuster story about Mayor Rob Ford before the local newspaper that has dedicated itself most to following his trail."

Comment Policy

J-Source invites comments on any content items or on any other topics relevant to journalism. Those posting comments are expected to adhere to standards of accuracy and fairness that would be recognized by those who practise, teach or study journalism.

  • Comments are restricted to registered users. You must register with your full first and last name in order to be eligible to comment.
  • Please communicate as effectively and intelligently as you would in a professional or academic forum, focusing on the issues at hand rather than the characters or characteristics of those involved.
  • This forum is intended for discussion of the craft of journalism, not of the issues of the day that journalists cover; please do not post story tips or press releases.
  • We moderate the forum for adherence to these standards of discourse, and reserve the right to decline any comment or restrict any user from commenting without giving reasons. Every effort is made to approve valid comments within 24 hours of submission.