Judge lifts Blackberry ban at Col. Williams hearing
ShareThisJournalists are now allowed to bring their laptops and cell phones into
court during the sentencing hearing for Col. Russell Williams, who has
admitted to murder and sexual stalking. Through his lawyer he annoucned plans to plead guilty to murder, sexual assault and a series of break-ins and thefts.
The ban on reporters' Blackberrys, laptops and cellphones was lifted by Ontario Superior Court Justice Robert Scott after a pre-trial motion from the CBC and the Ottawa Citizen.
The CBC reports that media lawyers argued for access to case exhibits, requesting that restrictions on journalists in the courtroom be lifted.
CBC writes:
"Scott also ruled that audio tape recording devices will be allowed to facilitate the taking of accurate notes. Members of the public will not be allowed to use laptops, cellphones or other recording devices during the sentencing and plea.
"The media lawyers also asked the judge, as well as prosecutors and Williams's lawyer, for clarification over what evidence can be released to the public and what can be published in the case once his sentencing hearing begins."
The decision is expected to happen after Monday, when evidence will be presented to the court. Journalists can then inquire about which evidence--which includes graphic photos, women's underwear and detailed notes Williams wrote about his crimes--can be shown to the public, and which should be held back to protect the victims.
The ban on reporters' Blackberrys, laptops and cellphones was lifted by Ontario Superior Court Justice Robert Scott after a pre-trial motion from the CBC and the Ottawa Citizen.
The CBC reports that media lawyers argued for access to case exhibits, requesting that restrictions on journalists in the courtroom be lifted.
CBC writes:
"Scott also ruled that audio tape recording devices will be allowed to facilitate the taking of accurate notes. Members of the public will not be allowed to use laptops, cellphones or other recording devices during the sentencing and plea.
"The media lawyers also asked the judge, as well as prosecutors and Williams's lawyer, for clarification over what evidence can be released to the public and what can be published in the case once his sentencing hearing begins."
The decision is expected to happen after Monday, when evidence will be presented to the court. Journalists can then inquire about which evidence--which includes graphic photos, women's underwear and detailed notes Williams wrote about his crimes--can be shown to the public, and which should be held back to protect the victims.
Comment Policy
J-Source invites comments on any content items or on any other topics relevant to journalism. Those posting comments are expected to adhere to standards of accuracy and fairness that would be recognized by those who practise, teach or study journalism.
- Comments are restricted to registered users. You must register with your full first and last name in order to be eligible to comment.
- Please communicate as effectively and intelligently as you would in a professional or academic forum, focusing on the issues at hand rather than the characters or characteristics of those involved.
- This forum is intended for discussion of the craft of journalism, not of the issues of the day that journalists cover; please do not post story tips or press releases.
- We moderate the forum for adherence to these standards of discourse, and reserve the right to decline any comment or restrict any user from commenting without giving reasons. Every effort is made to approve valid comments within 24 hours of submission.



Opinion: Media's latest stories on Toronto's Mayor Ford a challenge for a court fight
Thank you, Thomas, I'll check it out.
Everything journalists need to know about "Crackgate"
- this whole thing says a LOT more about the state of the press in Canada (I won...
Opinion: The National Newspaper Awards don't reflect journalism in the digital era
The NNAs have been irrelevant for some time now. Basically, the major newspaper chains buy...