A quick guide to "affect" and "effect"

ShareThisIn the slippery world of “affect versus effect” many default to the “affect is a verb and effect is a noun” thought process. But both words can be used as both noun and verb, which makes choosing the right word in this manner a matter of gut-feeling guesswork. This dilemma is explained well in a blog post from PoynterOnline.

Roy Peter Clark, who often writes the “Writing Tools” column, defines the words and then offers his own trick for deciding which one is correct: Clark’s Wager, a play on Pascal’s Wager, is a pseudo-scientific theory that “explains” the difference between “affect” and “effect.”

Clark writes: “When it comes to noun forms, I bet on "effect," because it is more common. But with the verb forms, I'll wager on "affect," because "chances are" I'll be correct. I'm not bragging about this, believe me. I've used the same dodgy approach to commas, periods and quotations marks.”

But this method doesn't work all of the time, so Clark also offers eight tips to help those writers that don’t want to gamble with their prose:

  • As a noun "effect" is more common than "affect."
  • The noun "effect" means "that which is caused."
  • The noun "affect" refers to the face we show the world.
  • The verb "affect" is more common than "effect."
  • The verb "affect" means "to influence."
  • The verb "effect" means "to bring about" and is often used with the object "change."
  • In a crunch, use Clark's Wager: bet on the most common usage.
  • If you bet wrong, be ready to thank a copy editor for saving your ass.

Comments

Effect/affect is easy. Anybody writing for a newspaper will already know something that basic. Explain to us when we should use "who", and when we should use "whom".
Thanks for the comment, Tim. Who/whom is one of my favourite grammar conundrums, if only because it took me so long to really figure it out. Stay tuned to the Students' Lounge. I'll post about who versus whom sometime next week.
Melissa, could you please address its/it's too? Maybe you could replace William Safire's "On Language!"
Deborah, I'd be happy to! Its/it's IS my all-time favourite grammar story to tell. I touched on it briefly in a previous entry (Apostrophes and you, http://www.j-source.ca/english_new/detail.php?id=4495) but I'll do a followup that deals specifically with its/it's. To all other SL readers: A comprehensive grammar guide is in the works (including lessons on punctuation, commonly confused words and all those little things that trip you up) and should be coming out in the near future. In the mean time, if anyone has any specific questions regarding grammar/usage/punctuation/etc., please don't hesitate to email me at mw@melissawilson.ca with quandaries that you want to see included in the grammar guide or addressed in the Students' Lounge. Sidenote: One of my "dream job" career goals is to be the Canadian version of Grammar Girl...
"It's" is always a contraction for "it is" or "it has". It is never used for the possessive -- ex., "the dog wagged its tail" or, I suppose, "It's wagged its tail." I think we should just get rid of the who/whom distinction and just go with "who" in all circumstances. Unlike affect/effect or uninterested/disinterested, it is a distinction without a difference. Like le/la in French, the difference in spelling doesn't add even a sliver of subtle meaning to the sentence. It exists only as a rule to give pedants cause to dance in triumph when others slip up.

Comment Policy

J-Source invites comments on any content items or on any other topics relevant to journalism. Those posting comments are expected to adhere to standards of accuracy and fairness that would be recognized by those who practise, teach or study journalism.

  • Comments are restricted to registered users. You must register with your full first and last name in order to be eligible to comment.
  • Please communicate as effectively and intelligently as you would in a professional or academic forum, focusing on the issues at hand rather than the characters or characteristics of those involved.
  • This forum is intended for discussion of the craft of journalism, not of the issues of the day that journalists cover; please do not post story tips or press releases.
  • We moderate the forum for adherence to these standards of discourse, and reserve the right to decline any comment or restrict any user from commenting without giving reasons. Every effort is made to approve valid comments within 24 hours of submission.
source