Town Hall

Oct 14, 2007 - Posted by Deborah Jones
There have been many calls on blogs, journalism sites and various public speakers for more, not less, stories about the so-called Jena 6 (six Americans involved in an incident of noose-hanging then beatings). The issue struck me as not critical to Canadians especially just now, with so many other big issues here and around the world and a dearth of space and time. However today's thoughtful essay in the New York Times about media coverage of the affair, "Racial Crisis? Or Just Rope in the Hands of Fools," is I think relevant, and to everyone in modern media. An excerpt:

There are few historic moments as honored and ingrained in the American psyche as those from the civil rights struggles of the 1960s, but how much they translate to the current moment is far less clear. So maybe the product relaunch of the noose as an odious signifier of hate speech bespeaks something fundamentally askew in the national psyche.

And maybe it’s just the distorting mirror of the never-ending media cavalcade, where any moron with a Sharpie and a length of cord from Home Depot can make a statement heard round the world.

“One theory about media is that it’s not so much telling the news as it is retelling old folk tales,” said Tom Rosenstiel, director of the Project for Excellence in Journalism. “The idea should be to put facts in context, not to put them into familiar arrangements that reinforce old attitudes.”

See also Jena six case: What's fact?
Oct 14, 2007
Clark Hoyt, public editor of The New York Times, questions the transparency and fairness of the "Questions For" column in the Times magazine. His concerns shine a spotlight on the fuzzy standards that apply to the "Q&A" interview form that's a stock-in-trade for magazines, and it's not a long road from there to the question of how much latitude feature writers should have in mixing and matching quotes taken from longer and multiple interviews. It's probably less than surprising to any one who has dabbled with the Q&A form -- but probably surprising to most readers -- that Deborah Solomon's reliably entertaining, brisk and edgy 700-word offerings turn out to be, as Hoyt found: 
    ...boiled down from interviews that sometimes last more than an hour and run 10,000 words. Though presented in a way that suggests a verbatim transcript, the order of the interview is sometimes altered, and the wording of questions is changed — for clarity or context, editors say. At least three interviews have been conducted by e-mail because the subjects couldn’t speak English or had other speech difficulties. And, Solomon told me, “Very early on, I might have inserted a question retroactively, so the interview would flow better,” a practice she said she no longer uses.

Hoyt faults the magazine's editors for the way they have responded to complaints from interviewees Tim Russert and Ira Glass, and calls for the weekly column to be accompanied by "a brief description of the editing standards: the order of questions may be changed, information may be added for clarity, and the transcript has been boiled down without indicating where material has been removed.

"If such a disclaimer destroys the illusion," Hoyt concludes, "maybe 'Questions For' needs to be rethought."

The Public Editor: Questions and Answers, in No Particular Order. The New York Times, October 14, 2007.



          
Oct 13, 2007 - Posted by Deborah Jones
An Associated Press story takes a look at increased surveillance and censorship in China in the lead-up to the Communist Party Congress next week. ""For China's 162 million web users, surfing the Internet can be like running an obstacle course with blocked websites, partial search results, and posts disappearing at every turn," said the story by reporter Alexa Olesen. The piece also looks briefly at how one blogger, who is also a lawyer, is suing his Internet Service Provider over censorship. An excerpt:

In the lead-up to the sensitive Communist Party Congress, which convenes Monday to approve top leaders who will serve under President Hu Jintao through 2012, authorities have been casting an even wider net than usual in their search for web content they deem to be politically threatening or potentially destabilizing.

"What you see now is unprecedented," said Xiao Qiang, director of the China Internet Project at the University of California, Berkeley. "They are forcing most of the interactive sites to simply close down and have unplugged Internet data centres. These are things they haven't done before."
Oct 13, 2007 - Posted by Penney Kome
Get ready to hear what a US panel considers to be the most important and under-reported stories of the past year. The conference announcement states:

Project Censored holds its annual conference Oct 26 and 27, at Sonoma State University, California.  

Throughout the day on Saturday, October 27, panelists will present
and discuss some of the great investigative reports featured in the
Censored 2008 Top 25 under-covered stories of the year (see web site
for details). Project Censoreds popular Top 25 AWARDS CEREMONY will take place during a buffet-style luncheon on Saturday.

After the conference and the news release, there's usually some buzz about the top ten winners, at least in the alternative media.   

Oct 12, 2007 - Posted by Deborah Jones
American authorities have now detained Iraqi news photographer Bilal Hussein, who worked for the Associated Press and is a Pulitzer Prize winner, for 18 months.

The AP's web site today has a special feature on Hussein, which includes a long list of links with comprehensive information:

The U.S. military in Iraq has imprisoned Associated Press photographer Bilal Hussein since April 12, 2006, accusing him of being a security threat but never filing charges or permitting a public hearing. "We want the rule of law to prevail," says AP President and CEO Tom Curley. "He either needs to be charged or released. Indefinite detention is not acceptable." Military officials say that Hussein was being held for "imperative reasons of security" under United Nations resolutions. A Pentagon spokesman reiterated that stance Sept. 18. Hussein is a 35-year-old Iraqi citizen and a native of Fallujah. AP executives said an internal review of his work did not find anything to indicate inappropriate contact with insurgents, and any evidence against him should be brought to the Iraqi criminal justice system. Hussein began working for the AP in September 2004. He photographed events in Fallujah and Ramadi until he was detained.

Bilal Hussein is one of an estimated 14,000 people detained by the U.S. military worldwide -- 13,000 of them in Iraq. They are held in limbo where few are ever charged with a specific crime or given a chance before any court or tribunal to argue for their freedom. In Hussein's case, Curley and other AP executives say, the military has not provided any concrete evidence to back up the vague allegations they have raised about him. 

 Reporters Without Borders is outraged. And the Committee to Protect Journalists is calling on the U.S. to release him.
Oct 12, 2007 - Posted by Deborah Jones
Reporters Without Borders and "Chinese Human Rights Defenders" says their new joint study "reveals how that country's government censors the Internet and how the Internet Information Administrative Bureau controls the leading news websites."

Reporters Without Borders calls China the world's biggest prison for journalists and cyber-dissident. Reporters Without Borders also has a petition, announced in 2001, to boycott the 2008 games in Beijing.)

Also this week, Bob Dietz of the Committee to Protect Journalists gave a speech in which he called on the Chinese government to release the 29 journalists now imprisoned in China and to begin dismantling the country’s vast censorship system. Dietz, CPJ’s Asia program coordinator, urged China and the International Olympic Committee to meet the free-press promises made when the 2008 Games were awarded to Beijing. The Games are less than a year away. Here's a link to the speech, before the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Oct 12, 2007 - Posted by Deborah Jones
Irving family companies control most of the media in New Brunswick. Now, they're in court trying to stop an upstart from setting up a competing newspaper. CBC has a story about the case, and the Irving company's complaint that a former publisher is using confidential information obtained while he worked for them to go into business. Excerpts:
 
A former newspaper executive with Brunswick News Inc. in western New Brunswick says the company is trying to prevent him from starting a competing title in Woodstock.

In court documents obtained by CBC News, Brunswick News alleges William Kenneth Langdon is using confidential information he obtained as one of their publishers to establish his own newspaper in direct competition with the Woodstock Bugle-Observer.

Langdon resigned on Sept. 19 after working as publisher of the Bugle-Observer for four years. He worked for Brunswick News, which is owned by J.D. Irving Ltd., for 10 years.    
Oct 12, 2007 - Posted by Deborah Jones
Today's New York Times has a piece about how American broadcaster ABC is reshaping its news cast for the Internet. There are some differences, and some innovations. Excerpts:

Executives at the broadcast networks know they have opportunities online that they do not have on television — namely, to take chances by testing new forms of news delivery and new types of storytelling. They are also mindful that making their content relevant online is a good way to attract the younger audiences who are less likely to tune in to the evening news on television.

But ABC is the only major broadcast network that is using the staff of its evening newscast to produce a separate and distinct daily program for a Web audience. The 15-minute Webcast often features (Charles) Gibson in the anchor chair, but the similarities end there: the segments can run long, and they purposely look raw and personal, as if they were made for MTV rather than ABC.

Over the course of 20 months, the Webcast has evolved from a basic distillation of the day’s news into an original program that incorporates video blogs, first-person essays and interviews. It covers many of the same stories as its television sibling, but often in a different way: in one example, the day after President Bush announced gradual troop cuts in Iraq, Mr. Gibson was shown debriefing the network’s chief White House correspondent, Martha Raddatz, in the Webcast for a full 3 minutes and 20 seconds — an eternity on a half-hour television newscast.

Oct 12, 2007 - Posted by Deborah Jones
News
The Guardian newspaper calls it a "landmark" ruling in defence of investigative reporting. Britain's court of appeal has used the defence of "responsible journalism" to dismiss a libel action against the publisher of a book about police corruption.
The October 2007 ruling shields the media from libel actions "even if not every allegation can be proved, (if) their writing amounted to 'responsible journalism' on a matter of public interest," the paper reports. A former detective filed the lawsuit, claiming the book suggested he was involved in police corruption.
Read the BBC and Times of London reports.
A British media lawyer comments on the ruling.
See also: British ruling shields 'responsible journalism'
Oct 12, 2007 - Posted by Deborah Jones
 "The screams from newsrooms are those of panic," Jim Lehrer, the well known American public television anchor, told a group of university students at Northwestern. Journalism is going through an "unpleasant" revolution, he said -- but argued that the demise of mainstream media may be exaggerated.

Lehrer is a guy usually worth listening to, imo.

Hat tip to Press Notes from the Society of Professional Journalists
Syndicate content

Town Hall

Town Hall is a centre for conversations about journalism in Canada. Comments on all items across the site are streamed in the Recent Comments section.

Correct our facts: Did we get something wrong? Please tell us!

Suggest a story: We're always looking for content tips.

Post a general comment: Sound off here.

J-Source will always be a work in progress: please make it your project by offering your suggestions and critique.