J-Topics
Oct 12, 2007
- Posted by Deborah
Jones
Irving family companies control most of the media in New Brunswick. Now, they're in court trying to stop an upstart from setting up a competing newspaper. CBC has a story about the case, and the Irving company's complaint that a former publisher is using confidential information obtained while he worked for them to go into business. Excerpts:
A former newspaper executive with Brunswick News Inc. in western New Brunswick says the company is trying to prevent him from starting a competing title in Woodstock.
In court documents obtained by CBC News, Brunswick News alleges William Kenneth Langdon is using confidential information he obtained as one of their publishers to establish his own newspaper in direct competition with the Woodstock Bugle-Observer.
Langdon resigned on Sept. 19 after working as publisher of the Bugle-Observer for four years. He worked for Brunswick News, which is owned by J.D. Irving Ltd., for 10 years.
A former newspaper executive with Brunswick News Inc. in western New Brunswick says the company is trying to prevent him from starting a competing title in Woodstock.
In court documents obtained by CBC News, Brunswick News alleges William Kenneth Langdon is using confidential information he obtained as one of their publishers to establish his own newspaper in direct competition with the Woodstock Bugle-Observer.
Langdon resigned on Sept. 19 after working as publisher of the Bugle-Observer for four years. He worked for Brunswick News, which is owned by J.D. Irving Ltd., for 10 years.
Oct 11, 2007
- Posted by Heather
McCall
In this opinion piece for rabble.ca, Maude Barlow, national chairperson of the Council of Canadians, links the April 2007 lockout of le Journal staff to policies stemming from Sun Media newsroom consolidations.
Oct 11, 2007
- Posted by Paul
Benedetti
This dust-up with the Tyee and writer Robert Pritchard and subsequent comments is really pretty interesting stuff and speaks volumes on the issue of media concentration and the strange and regrettable lack of media critics in the, well, media!
Sep 20, 2007
- Posted by Deborah
Jones
Some excerpts of recent stories about this week's CRTC hearings:
Federal broadcast regulators revealed anxieties over delving into journalistic standards and independence as they heard complaints from unions on Wednesday about the negative consequences of cross-media ownership. Canadian Press story on CBC.ca
-- Canada's broadcasters should be required to compete for their licences when they come up for renewal, which would make incumbent companies more accountable and ensure new players can break into the industry, regulators were told Wednesday. Grant Robertson, in the Globe and Mail, reports that a media union wants licence renewals opened to competition to bring more diversity in an era of consolidation.
In context, commercial networks argue that Canadian companies need to grow through mergers and takeovers to compete on a global stage being reshaped by the Internet. On the other side, media guilds, arts advocates and production industry groups argued that consolidation is dangerous to the diversity of broadcast voices in Canada.
-- The federal broadcasting regulator is learning quickly that if it wants to impose new rules to restrict market concentration, it will do so over the vehement opposition of the country's big media companies. The Canadian Press.
-- The debate over media consolidation in Canada is turning into a fight over who controls access to the millions of television sets across the country. Grant Robertson, the Globe and Mail.
- Should the CRTC choose to limit the growth of Canadian media companies, domestic players will be at risk of being swept away by giants such as News Corp. and Google, Quebecor Media Inc. told the broadcast regulator on Tuesday. Paul Vieira, Financial Post
Federal broadcast regulators revealed anxieties over delving into journalistic standards and independence as they heard complaints from unions on Wednesday about the negative consequences of cross-media ownership. Canadian Press story on CBC.ca
-- Canada's broadcasters should be required to compete for their licences when they come up for renewal, which would make incumbent companies more accountable and ensure new players can break into the industry, regulators were told Wednesday. Grant Robertson, in the Globe and Mail, reports that a media union wants licence renewals opened to competition to bring more diversity in an era of consolidation.
In context, commercial networks argue that Canadian companies need to grow through mergers and takeovers to compete on a global stage being reshaped by the Internet. On the other side, media guilds, arts advocates and production industry groups argued that consolidation is dangerous to the diversity of broadcast voices in Canada.
-- The federal broadcasting regulator is learning quickly that if it wants to impose new rules to restrict market concentration, it will do so over the vehement opposition of the country's big media companies. The Canadian Press.
-- The debate over media consolidation in Canada is turning into a fight over who controls access to the millions of television sets across the country. Grant Robertson, the Globe and Mail.
- Should the CRTC choose to limit the growth of Canadian media companies, domestic players will be at risk of being swept away by giants such as News Corp. and Google, Quebecor Media Inc. told the broadcast regulator on Tuesday. Paul Vieira, Financial Post
Sep 18, 2007
- Posted by Paul
Benedetti
Bell Canada Inc. says the CRTC should consider guidelines, as opposed to formal rules, in an effort to ensure diversity of Canadian programming. The proposal came during the second day of CRTC hearings, in which the regulator is looking to establish policies aimed at protecting Canadian content in a consolidated media sector. So far, the CBC has sided with the CRTC's proposed plans, while Quebecor warned against the risk of being swept away by such global giants as News Corp. and Google Inc. The hearings are scheduled until the end of the week.
Sep 17, 2007
- Posted by Deborah
Jones
"The level of consolidation in the Canadian media industry has reached levels that “in any other country would be considered unacceptable,” Canada's public broadcaster told regulators Monday at the start of federal hearings into the state of ownership concentration in broadcasting," reports the Globe and Mail's Grant Robertson, live online. "“Our view is, generally speaking, the level of concentration is too high,” said Richard Stursberg, executive vice-president of English language operations at the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation."
Predictably, Stursberg's comments were instantly contradicted by the Canadian Association of Broadcasters, which wants no new rules. Robertson's story quoted Glenn O'Farrell, president of the CAB, which represents the industry, including commercial broadcasters such as CTV, Global, TVA and others.: "We see no diversity deficit in the Canadian system.”
In Vancouver, where I live, citizens subsist largely on a commercial diet supplied by CanWest, which for years has controlled three of the four daily papers (Sun, Province, National Post), two of the main provincial television stations, most of the other dailies in the province including Victoria's Times Colonist, nearly all of the free "community" newspapers (ie, wrapping for large piles of flyers) that land on local doorsteps, and has been involved in the still-evolving transit newspapers. It's not quite a CanWest monopoly -- options include the Globe (not easily available in many outlying areas), CTV, CBC in its various forms and a handful of alternative papers and not-quite-mainstream television broadcasters -- but anyone who claims there's no diversity deficit is plain wrong, especially in British Columbia.
BTW, kudos to the Globe and Mail for consistenly reporting on this issue; there has been a deficit of reporting about it in most CanWest papers. (In the past six months the Globe has run 200 stories citing Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, compared to 76 in CanWest's National Post, which is that chain's paper of record on financial and national stories. The Toronto Star -- which is the country's largest paper but can be partly excused because it doesn't claim to be a national paper of record, ran 49 stories.) I think the failure to report on this, including failure to report without bias, is a dereliction of duty and shows why CRTC regulation is needed. Media -- specifically journalism -- is of critical public importance and the fact that it's often almost ignored as a subject by Canadian media, with a few outstanding exceptions, weakens our democracy.
Predictably, Stursberg's comments were instantly contradicted by the Canadian Association of Broadcasters, which wants no new rules. Robertson's story quoted Glenn O'Farrell, president of the CAB, which represents the industry, including commercial broadcasters such as CTV, Global, TVA and others.: "We see no diversity deficit in the Canadian system.”
In Vancouver, where I live, citizens subsist largely on a commercial diet supplied by CanWest, which for years has controlled three of the four daily papers (Sun, Province, National Post), two of the main provincial television stations, most of the other dailies in the province including Victoria's Times Colonist, nearly all of the free "community" newspapers (ie, wrapping for large piles of flyers) that land on local doorsteps, and has been involved in the still-evolving transit newspapers. It's not quite a CanWest monopoly -- options include the Globe (not easily available in many outlying areas), CTV, CBC in its various forms and a handful of alternative papers and not-quite-mainstream television broadcasters -- but anyone who claims there's no diversity deficit is plain wrong, especially in British Columbia.
BTW, kudos to the Globe and Mail for consistenly reporting on this issue; there has been a deficit of reporting about it in most CanWest papers. (In the past six months the Globe has run 200 stories citing Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, compared to 76 in CanWest's National Post, which is that chain's paper of record on financial and national stories. The Toronto Star -- which is the country's largest paper but can be partly excused because it doesn't claim to be a national paper of record, ran 49 stories.) I think the failure to report on this, including failure to report without bias, is a dereliction of duty and shows why CRTC regulation is needed. Media -- specifically journalism -- is of critical public importance and the fact that it's often almost ignored as a subject by Canadian media, with a few outstanding exceptions, weakens our democracy.
Jul 29, 2007
- Posted by Bill
Reynolds
Kelly Toughill, a journalism professor at King's College, questions whether two upcoming reports commissioned by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission on their policies and a series of hearings on the future of the industry this fall will fully address the growing, and ever-changing, influence new media has on Canada’s media landscape.
Jul 14, 2007
- Posted by Deborah
Jones
A Canadian Press story by Merito Ilo takes a look at the international media coverage of Conrad Black's conviction, noting that "stories published Saturday in the U.S., British and Canadian media, including some newspapers that belonged to Black's former media empire, Hollinger International, differed only in their choice of words, but not in their "he got what he deserved" attitude."
Jul 13, 2007
- Posted by Patricia
Elliott
A campaign was launched today to get Canadians involved in
decisions about the future of the country's media landscape. Canadians
for Democratic Media is urging people to send a message to the CRTC
calling for policies that limit concentrated and cross-ownership in the
media and support public and community-based media.
"We are in the middle of a major wave of private media consolidation in this country and we are very worried about what it means for access to a diversity of made-in-Canada news and entertainment in cities and towns across the country," says Steve Anderson, coordinator of Canadians for Democratic Media. "Recent history suggests we are headed for even less local coverage and less original programming.
Below: Video short produced by Canadians for a Democratic Media:
"We are in the middle of a major wave of private media consolidation in this country and we are very worried about what it means for access to a diversity of made-in-Canada news and entertainment in cities and towns across the country," says Steve Anderson, coordinator of Canadians for Democratic Media. "Recent history suggests we are headed for even less local coverage and less original programming.
Below: Video short produced by Canadians for a Democratic Media:
Jul 09, 2007
- Posted by Deborah
Jones
Ken Auletta takes an in-depth look at the takeover attempt of the WSJ by Rupert Murdoch -- which seems to be proceeding like a juggernaut -- and how Murdoch keeps his promises. Or not. An excerpt:
Those who are suspicious of Murdoch’s pledges of noninterference recall what happened when he first extended his press holdings beyond his native Australia, nearly forty years ago: he persuaded the Carr family of London to sell him the sensational tabloid News of the World, and promised to run the paper in partnership with the family that had owned the paper for nearly eighty years; he abandoned this pledge after learning, he said, that to honor it would harm shareholders because the Carrs had created “a total wreck of a company.” When he bought the New York Post from Dorothy Schiff, in 1976, he publicly pledged to leave its liberal editorial stance unchanged, saying, “The New York Post will continue to serve New York and New Yorkers and maintain its present policies and traditions”—and promptly reversed course. But Murdoch’s approach may best be seen in what happened after he bought the influential and once storied Times of London and the Sunday Times, in 1981. At the time, English journalists asked their Australian-born colleague Phillip Knightley to analyze how Murdoch might behave, and as Knightley now recalls, “The point I made was that Murdoch came from a tradition very different from European and American proprietors. In Australia, a proprietor owned the paper and considered it was his to do whatever he liked with it. Proprietors used their newspapers to support or oppose political parties, settle private feuds, and cross-promote their other interests. Any idea that they could not do this would have met with bewilderment.”
Those who are suspicious of Murdoch’s pledges of noninterference recall what happened when he first extended his press holdings beyond his native Australia, nearly forty years ago: he persuaded the Carr family of London to sell him the sensational tabloid News of the World, and promised to run the paper in partnership with the family that had owned the paper for nearly eighty years; he abandoned this pledge after learning, he said, that to honor it would harm shareholders because the Carrs had created “a total wreck of a company.” When he bought the New York Post from Dorothy Schiff, in 1976, he publicly pledged to leave its liberal editorial stance unchanged, saying, “The New York Post will continue to serve New York and New Yorkers and maintain its present policies and traditions”—and promptly reversed course. But Murdoch’s approach may best be seen in what happened after he bought the influential and once storied Times of London and the Sunday Times, in 1981. At the time, English journalists asked their Australian-born colleague Phillip Knightley to analyze how Murdoch might behave, and as Knightley now recalls, “The point I made was that Murdoch came from a tradition very different from European and American proprietors. In Australia, a proprietor owned the paper and considered it was his to do whatever he liked with it. Proprietors used their newspapers to support or oppose political parties, settle private feuds, and cross-promote their other interests. Any idea that they could not do this would have met with bewilderment.”
Media Ownership
It seems like everyone is wheeling and dealing in the media sector. In this section we've collected examples of these deals and explore the effects of changes in ownership. To browse through other topics of interest, visit our J-Topics section.
News & Views
Advice & Resources
Education & Research
J-Topics
- J-Topics
- Archive
![]() | Support J-Source | ||
![]() | Best online-only article or series | ||
J-Source and ProjetJ are projects of The Canadian Journalism Foundation in collaboration with leading schools and organizations Editor-in-chief, J-Source: | |||




Official list of Globe and Mail staff who took the buyouts
Why is this nice easy list of names with subheds not published as plain HTML (H2, OL, LI) with...
Do ethnocultural newspapers have a future in Canada?
Ethnic newspapers continue to provide a valuable role in transmitting information on Canadian...
OPINION: Video, shmideo: reporting is about telling what you see and hear
"It was as disreputable a piece of character assassination as I've ever seen in a...