Do journalists have an ethical obligation to moderate online conversations generated by their stories?
There is no magic formula for ensuring a civil exchange of relevant ideas and opinions. Setting the ground rules, monitoring the conversation and being engaged in it can go long way to achieving that goal, says a report by the Canadian Association of Journalists’ ethics advisory committee.
By Ellen van Wageningen
Readers say the darnedest things in online comments and not all of them are appropriate. Most journalists agree that an online conversation attached to a news or feature story is not the place for name calling, malicious comments, bullying and unrelated rants. However, in the 24-hour, widely accessible online world, there is no magic formula for ensuring a civil exchange of relevant ideas and opinions. Setting the ground rules, monitoring the conversation and being engaged in it can go long way to achieving that goal, says a report by the Canadian Association of Journalists’ ethics advisory committee.
Related content on J-Source:
- On the record: Is it really consent without talk of consequences?
- Readers attack: How and why journalists should respond to online comments
- Winnipeg Free Press restricts online comments to subscribers in effort to reduce “digital diatribe”
Tamara Baluja is an award-winning journalist with CBC Vancouver and the 2018 Michener-Deacon fellow for journalism education. She was the associate editor for J-Source from 2013-2014.
