Since the Ontario premier announced changes to student fee policies, many have called out the risks for campus media. But weakening student journalism won’t just threaten the schools’ information access
Disclosure: The author was an employee of Carleton University’s the Charlatan newspaper staff between 2005 and 2006, and is also a former Charlatan board member.
Campus media serve as a vital training ground for young journalists looking to break into the field. But in the wake of the Ontario government’s decision to make most post-secondary student levies optional, researchers and campus news outlets worry that as the cuts take hold, not only will a new generation of reporters lose critical opportunities for on-the-job training, but also readers outside of schools will lose access to one of the remaining bastions of local news amid a sea of community newspaper cutbacks.
Student-run newspapers tend to take a hard look at the university and college ecosystem and hold educational decision-makers to account, said Sally Haney, the assistant chair of journalism at Mount Royal University in Calgary.
“If we see those (campus) publications shuttered because of policies such as the one that Ford is executing, that is a big blow for a healthy democracy that needs to have journalists examining decisions in the public realm,” Haney told J-Source.
Haney is working on a study examining whether journalism programs have a bigger role to play in generating local news, now that there are fewer and smaller community news outlets. So far, Haney’s group has heard from 22 universities and colleges across Canada that run journalism programs, and data analysis is ongoing. These programs include hundreds of journalism and broadcasting students who engage in local news reporting, and Haney’s team is interested to see how they can fill the voids left by shuttered newspapers.
More than 250 Canadian news media outlets closed in the past 10 years, according to data from the Local News Research Project, most of them community newspapers. Those outlets that do survive reduce beat reporting in favour of general coverage, to save on costs, Haney said.
In an era where education beat reporting is shrinking due to ongoing local news cutbacks, these student outlets serve a vital municipal role, Haney argued.
In January, Doug Ford’s Progressive Conservative government announced that most ancillary fees students pay will be optional, with the exception of pan-campus services such as athletics. The Globe and Mail reported that most students pay between $500 and $2,000 a year in these fees, which not only go towards campus media, but also support services such as student government, LGBTQ centres and food banks.
A media spokesperson from the Ontario Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities did not respond to a request for comment.
In addition to concerns about the effects of cutbacks on their levies, student journalists across Ontario are worried about the democratic process for students.
“An opt out at registration is not democratic,” said Matthew Crosier, station manager of Carleton University’s student-supported radio station, CKCU. More than two-thirds of the station’s funds come from levies, and the station endeavours to raise $130,000 annually through fundraising to supplement the guaranteed funding. This money in part supports four full-time staff and more than 200 volunteers.
We stand in solidarity with campus radio stations against @fordnation's plan to let students opt out of ancillary fees. Please talk to your fellow students about damaging this policy change would be. #defendcampusradio #FRINR
— Ottawa Showbox (@OttawaShowbox) March 7, 2019
“The CKCU student levy was voted on and supported by Carleton students in a number of student referendums. If there is an issue with the levy, it should be discussed at a campus level and decided by the students with a vote,” Crosier added by email. “An opt out is not a vote. There has been no consultation by the Ontario government with any station, any student union and to the best of my knowledge, any campus group that receives a student levy. Is there to be an opt out at registration every year? How can any organization ever build a budget around that?”
Ryerson University’s student radio station, CJRU, has an annual budget of about $460,000 to $485,000, with roughly 70 to 74 per cent supported by student levies. Since radio includes fixed equipment costs that cannot be reduced, the radio station anticipates “substantial change” after the board and executive meets to discuss the potential loss of the student levy, said general manager Jacky Tuinstra Harrison.
“If students do not want to pay for the radio, there is already a mechanism in place for them to run a referendum to reverse that funding, so what the Ford government has proposed doing is circumventing the democratic processes already in place,” Harrison said by email. “We are collecting letters of support to be called essential because we are also an emergency broadcaster, which means we air alerts for weather, natural disaster, missing children et cetera via a system that interrupts our broadcast.”
At the University of Guelph, the student-supported the Ontarion also serves a vital role in municipal events, such as the 2018 election. That’s because two years before, Metroland Media shut down the Guelph Mercury. This leaves Guelph as one of the only cities in Ontario with more than 100,000 people lacking a community newspaper, according to the Ryerson Review of Journalism.
While editor-in-chief Mirali Almaula said the newspaper is working hard on a plan, the worry is funding changes may happen too quickly for the newspaper to keep up – forcing it to shut down after nearly 70 years of operations and leaving Guelph closer to a “news desert.” Or the newspaper will need to become virtually volunteer-run, with only one or two paid staff members.
Student Choice Initiative leaves @cfru_radio scrambling for survival! As Ford government’s action deems community radio “non-essential service,” workers and volunteers are left in dismay. Article: Matteo Cimellaro & Photos: Alora Griffiths https://t.co/GV0qUnHYVS pic.twitter.com/c7bbfz730X
— The Ontarion (@theontarion) March 7, 2019
Annual expenses are $281,000 and about half of those are paid by the student levy. The editor-in-chief currently earns $34,400 a year while section editors earn minimum wage.
“We don’t know what the impact will be at this time,” Almaula said by email. “In the best case scenario we will have enough time to transition into our five-year plan, which allows us to save a lot of money as we move away from a weekly print paper to a monthly publication, improve our website to host more content, offer more experiential learning, and transition the majority of our staff to work-study positions so that we are reimbursed for approximately 60 per cent of their wages from the university.”
Many staff members at student media outlets are paid an honorarium in recognition for their work, but in most cases it’s nowhere near even a starting journalism salary. At campus newspapers, for example, students often drop to part-time studies to take on the load of a section editorship, receiving perhaps a few hundred dollars a month for their efforts. While editors-in-chief make a larger salary, it’s still difficult to make a living in cities such as Toronto, where there is a high cost of living.
At Ryerson student newspaper the Eyeopener, the levy made up nearly 88 per cent of the $490,500 budget in 2017-2018. This year, the budget supports 23 staff members, 19 of whom are students. Most editors make $250 a week, while the editor-in-chief receives $600. “It’s less than they’d be paid for their time elsewhere, but we try and make it as sustainable to living in Toronto as we can,” said Jacob Dubé, editor-in-chief of the Eyeopener, by email.
“Being able to employ and properly pay editors at the Eyeopener means that we can dedicate our time and effort to in-depth investigations and reporting,” Dubé added. “A cut in salaries or positions in general would mean that we simply wouldn’t have the resources to support enough journalists to be able to look at everything we would like to. The big problem with this is that, a lot of the time, if somebody isn’t holding those in power on campus accountable, a lot of issues and abuses of that power would go unnoticed.”
The Eyeopener’s recent work includes finding financial irregularities in the Ryerson Student Union’s spending. Shortly after their report was published, the Ryerson Students’ Union (RSU) voted to impeach the union’s president.
My team and I at The Eyeopener -a campus newspaper funded by students’ fees- broke this story. We need that money to keep doing the work that we do. https://t.co/955uR64H5C
— Emma Rose Sandri (@emmarosesandri) January 27, 2019
Carleton University’s the Charlatan supports 16 staff members, including 11 editorial staff, a business manager and four volunteer positions with tiny honorariums. Section editors receive a weekly honorarium between $120 and $160, while the editor-in-chief is paid $721.94 biweekly.
“I can confirm that a few of my editors definitely have second jobs while also balancing full-time school and their editorial duties,” said editor-in-chief Karen-Luz Sison by email, and that’s with 65 per cent of the 2017-18 annual budget of $239,844 coming from student levies. “Losing a portion of our student levy would mean having to do a complete organizational restructure, and likely even making editorial staff positions more volunteer-based, with an annual lump-sum honorarium,” Sison added.
Those Ontario post-secondary institutions with journalism programs often have two types of campus media outlets: those affiliated with the journalism program, and those that are independent of the program and supported by student levies. For example, one of Carleton University’s program-linked student publications is the digital-only Capital Current, while student-supported media includes radio station CKCU and newspaper the Charlatan.
This means that campus media will not disappear altogether, even if the worst fears surrounding the student levy loss come true.
Haney warned, however, that some issues may not be included in program-supported media. “If we see publications that operate via student levies shut down, you’ll see debate around issues like tuition and equitable access evaporate, because I don’t know who else would fill that slot.