Transcontinental boycott

ShareThisSome reaction to the boycott by independent writers against Transcontinental is dribbling in. Slowly, cautiously, too often anonymously ... geez writers are a timid breed.

A news story in the Montreal Gazette quoted Transcontinental vice-president, Pierre Marcoux, saying that writers misunderstand the contract. Writers retain copyright, he said, and will be paid when work is reused in paper form at other publications -- but they will not be paid if the work is republished on different media of the same brand. Marcoux also told the Gazette's Roberto Rocha that the majority of freelancers for Transcontinental in Quebec and Ontario have already signed the contract.

MastheadOnline reported comments from both sides. A single blog post on MastheadOnline, by magazine editor Corinna vanGerwen, noted that staff editors at Transcontinental are squeezed in the middle of the dispute -- and asked how they will cope. "It's a horrible position to be in," wrote vanGerwen. "Editors are the writers' connection to a magazine, and often the writers' biggest advocates, and unfortunately they are the ones who will hurt most from this action."

On Thursday at mid-day the Gazette report was the only mainstream-media story to come up on a Google news search for the words Transcontinental and boycott; there were no hits at all on a Yahoo.ca search.

A search of blogs and other things turned up only a little more information, and what little of it was new reverberated in the social media echo chamber.

D.B. Scott of the Canadian Magazines blog talked to Marcoux, who said in part, "We received this communication [the press release] the same as everybody else and we were suprised that 12 groups had joined with the Canadian Writers Group and PWAC, especially since we've never talked to them." Someone named "anonymous" was the most vehement among nearly a dozen commentators. Scott also put up a poll; only one "anonymous" person commented on his original post and as of Thursday 57 per cent of respondents (whose numbers were not provided and none of which commented) said the boycott was either "not likely" to work or "doesn't stand a chance."

Independent writer Patricia Pearson blogged, "Dear readers and friends, Please do me a kindness if you live in Canada, and refrain from buying the following magazines ..." Independent writer Kim Pittaway tweeted, "Re Transcon boycott: Wish it weren't necessary, but can't see any other option. Been personally boycotting since new contract came in." "Transcontinental blackballed," headlined a post on the Ryerson Review of Journalism blog. Caitlin Kelly called the Transcontinental contract "the Slave Agreement" and blogged that the boycott "is long overdue." An open Facebook group called Transcontinental had no boycott-related posts.


Comment Policy

J-Source invites comments on any content items or on any other topics relevant to journalism. Those posting comments are expected to adhere to standards of accuracy and fairness that would be recognized by those who practise, teach or study journalism.

  • Comments are restricted to registered users. You must register with your full first and last name in order to be eligible to comment.
  • Please communicate as effectively and intelligently as you would in a professional or academic forum, focusing on the issues at hand rather than the characters or characteristics of those involved.
  • This forum is intended for discussion of the craft of journalism, not of the issues of the day that journalists cover; please do not post story tips or press releases.
  • We moderate the forum for adherence to these standards of discourse, and reserve the right to decline any comment or restrict any user from commenting without giving reasons. Every effort is made to approve valid comments within 24 hours of submission.