CBC ombudsman: Maintaining the record vs the right to be forgotten
Like most media organizations, CBC News has a policy that it is only in exceptional circumstances that a story is removed from the web site. The rationale is that it can distort the public record when material is selectively deleted, writes CBC ombudsman Esther Enkin.
By Esther Enkin, CBC ombudsman
The complainant, Ed Mercer, wants a story about his company taken down because he says it is having a negative impact on his business. The article about home inspections gives his take on the story. CBC Journalistic Standard and Practices only allows removing a story in exceptional circumstances. There aren’t any in this case.
In October of last year, CBC News in Newfoundland ran a story about a man who bought a home with a leaking basement. He felt the home inspector had missed the signs of water damage on the studs in the basement. The story, entitled “Customer cries foul after home inspectors close ranks,” also alleges that other home inspectors would not review the work of one of their colleagues, and that the customer was not able to get a second opinion about the quality of the initial inspection. The head of the Newfoundland and Labrador Canadian Association of Home and Property Inspectors declined to review the initial inspection. He stated that oversight of home inspections and regulation of inspectors should be done by the provincial government.
Related content on J-Source:
- Globe public editor: One convicted journalist is guilty, others are not
- CBC ombudsman: Asperger's Syndrome doesn't cause killing
- Brunswick News ombudswoman: Are stories of tragedy intrusive or cathartic?
You are the owner and operator of the company that did the inspection. You requested that the story be removed from the website because your insurance company found that neither “my company or my inspector is responsible for any errors or omissions and we have been cleared of all liability.” You also pointed out that the report did refer to some areas of concern that could result in water getting into the basement. You feel the “company continues to be unfairly portrayed due to this article.” The continued presence of the online story on search engines has had a negative impact on your business, and since people search online for the kind of service you provide, you want the story gone.
Although the initial stories (radio, television and online) were published in October, 2013, you first contacted CBC in March of this year. The first response came from Peter Gullage, the Executive Producer of News in Newfoundland and Labrador. You provided the results of your insurer’s evaluation, and requested the removal of the story. He pointed out that in October, when the stories were prepared, the reporter had contacted you “for a response to the complaints of the home owner featured in the story but you refused to take advantage of the opportunity.” He told you CBC News stood by the story. He declined to remove it but did update the story with the information you provided. You then contacted this office, and the matter was referred to Andrew Cochran, Senior Managing Director, Atlantic Canada. He reviewed your correspondence with Mr. Gullage and reviewed the news story. He said he found “no basis to remove the material as it exists today on cbc.ca.”
Like most media organizations, CBC News has a policy that it is only in exceptional circumstances that a story is removed from the web site. The rationale is that it can distort the public record when material is selectively deleted.
To continue reading this review, please go the CBC ombudsman's website where this was originally published.
Related content on J-Source:
- Globe public editor: Headlines are hard to write, but they must be precise
- Star public editor: Rehab no free pass to zero accountability
- CBC ombudsman: Public deserves to know when they are going to have to see or hear shocking images